Ascension: taken up

ascension-of-jesusJesus taken up into heaven (1:6–11). Although we have entitled this section ‘The ascension’, it is doubtful whether the actual act of ascension is the central feature in the story. Luke is more concerned with what was said than with what happened. The vital question was the one posed by the disciples: now that Jesus had been raised from the dead, was God going to complete his purpose by finally establishing his rule? The answer given was twofold. First, the time of this event remained God’s secret; what was more important was the immediate task of the disciples which was to act as witnesses to Jesus from Jerusalem to the end of the earth. The spread of God’s rule was to take place by means of the disciples, empowered by the Spirit. This was the final command of Jesus before he left the disciples. Secondly, the departure of Jesus was interpreted as a pattern for his ultimate return to the earth to inaugurate the final establishment of the rule of God. These verses thus spell out God’s purpose and the place of the church in it. They postulate that the period of witness and mission must precede the return of Jesus. They were thus in effect a warning to the disciples not to expect a speedy winding up of history. For Luke’s readers some forty or more years later they were a reminder of an ongoing task: the gospel must still be taken to the end of the earth. At the same time the words contain a note of promise in that the departure of Jesus is compensated for by the coming of the Spirit, given by Jesus himself (2:33).

The question about restoring the rule to Israel in 1:6 also shows continued misunderstanding about what the kingdom of God meant. Acts 2:3 will show that God’s promise was about the coming of the Holy Spirit, not an earthly empire. The prohibition against trying to compute the times of the end is meant to discourage Luke’s readers from guessing what cannot be known. Rather, they should focus on the power of the Spirit as the sign of living in the promised final days. Luke says Christians are to use this power during whatever time is left to witness to Jesus to the ends of the earth. They should not waste energy trying to figure out when the end of the world will be.

Verse 1:8 provides a “table of contents” for Acts. The witness “in Jerusalem” is Acts 2 to 7. “Throughout Judea and Samaria” is from chapters 8 to 12, and to “the ends of the earth” from Acts 13 to 28. “The ends of the earth” is an echo of Isa 49:6 (“I will make you a light to the nations, that my salvation may reach to the ends of the earth.” – quoted explicitly in Acts 13:47)) Both Acts and the Psalms of Solomon, a slightly earlier non-Biblical Jewish writing, apply the phrase “the ends of the earth” to Rome. Acts ends in Rome. And Pss Sol 8:15 calls the Roman general Pompey “him that is from the end of the earth.” Of course, it can simply mean the whole of the world, even beyond Rome.

Acts 1:9 mentions that the disciples saw Jesus actually being taken up to heaven to remind readers of 2 Kgs 2:4–15. There, the prophet Elijah told his disciple Elisha that only if he saw Elijah being taken up to heaven would he receive double Elijah’s portion of the Holy Spirit. Elisha did see the flaming chariot take up Elijah and therefore received the same Spirit as Elijah. So in Acts 1:9, the disciples saw Jesus being taken up in a cloud and received Jesus’ Holy Spirit at Pentecost.

The disciples are portrayed as looking intently into the sky as Jesus disappears, a detail which suggests that they are longing for the reappearance of Jesus or some other happening which will indicate that what they have seen is not the final act in the drama. Their unspoken prayer is answered by the appearance of two figures dressed in white. The description is that of angels (Luke 24:4; Acts 10:30) who wear bright, shining clothes. Their function is to give a commentary on what has happened. They ask the disciples why they are gazing into heaven; the question is an implicit reproach of them for dawdling there and longing for Jesus to remain with them. Already the disciples have had a command as to what they are to do. Now they are given an assurance that the ascension of Jesus is a guarantee that, as it was possible for Jesus to ascend into heaven, so it will be possible for him to return in the same way, i.e. on a cloud at the parousia (Luke 21:27; Mark 14:62; cf. Dan. 7:13). Thus the promise of the parousia forms the background of hope against which the disciples are to act as the witnesses to Jesus. In effect the present passage corresponds to Jesus’ statement in Mark 13:10 that the gospel must first be preached to all nations before the end can come.

Notes

Acts 1:1 Theophilus: The name means ‘dear to God’, but it is doubtless the real name of a real person and not just a symbolical name. The omission of the courteous ‘most excellent’ used in Luke 1:3 is quite natural at the second occurrence of the name. Theophilus was probably already a Christian, and Luke wrote his book to help him and others like him to have a reliable account of the beginnings of Christianity.

Acts 1:3 He presented himself alive to them by many proofs: Jesus showed that he was alive by appearing to his disciples on several occasions. The stress lies on the factuality of the evidence, as we have it in the stories in Luke 24 where the initial unwillingness of the disciples to believe that Jesus was risen was overcome by the clear evidence presented to them. Nor did their conviction rest on one single experience, but rather on repeated pieces of proof. Although in Luke 24 the resurrection appearances of Jesus are presented as if they all took place on Easter Sunday, here Luke relates that they happened over an extended period of forty days.

appearing to them during forty days: Luke considered especially sacred the interval in which the appearances and instructions of the risen Jesus occurred and expressed it therefore in terms of the sacred number forty (cf Deut 8:2). In his gospel, however, Luke connects the ascension of Jesus with the resurrection by describing the ascension on Easter Sunday evening (Luke 24:50-53). What should probably be understood as one event (resurrection, glorification, ascension, sending of the Spirit–the paschal mystery) has been historicized by Luke when he writes of a visible ascension of Jesus after forty days and the descent of the Spirit at Pentecost. For Luke, the ascension marks the end of the appearances of Jesus except for the extraordinary appearance to Paul. With regard to Luke’s understanding of salvation history, the ascension also marks the end of the time of Jesus (Luke 24:50-53) and signals the beginning of the time of the church.

Acts 1:4 while meeting with them: The word used, synalizaomai, is unusual and has led to another of alternative translations including: “sharing a meal” or “eating with” as well as “staying with” or “lodging with.” For all alternatives there is textual and linguistic support. The primary meaning in Koine Greek is simply “meeting.”

the promise of the Father: the holy Spirit, as is clear from the next verse. This gift of the Spirit was first promised in Jesus’ final instructions to his chosen witnesses in Luke’s gospel (Luke 24:49; see also Gal. 3:14; Eph. 1:13 in the NT; Isa 32:15 and Joel 2:28-32 in OT) and formed part of the continuing instructions of the risen Jesus on the kingdom of God, of which Luke speaks in Acts 1:3.

about which you have heard me speak: When did the disciples hear this promise from Jesus himself? One possibility is that Luke 24:49 is in mind, but it is more likely that the present verse is a recapitulation of the saying in the Gospel, expressed in slightly different wording. We should, therefore, think perhaps of such teaching about the coming of the Spirit as we find in Matthew 10:20 (cf. Luke 12:12) and John 14–16.

Acts 1:5 John baptized with water… baptized with the holy Spirit: Jesus’ promise is strengthened by a reminder of the testimony of John the Baptist; he had claimed to baptize merely with water, but prophesied the coming of One who would baptize with the Spirit (Luke 3:16), and Jesus now alludes to this statement (cf. Peter’s citation of these words of Jesus in 11:16). To baptize literally means to immerse a person in water or to deluge him with it, usually as a means of cleansing. When the term is applied to the Spirit, it appears to refer to the pouring out of the Spirit from on high by God and is associated with the forgiveness of sins (Acts 2:38). But the metaphor of pouring out a liquid is ultimately inadequate to do justice to the gift of the Spirit who comes to God’s people, bringing power, wisdom and joy; as a result the term ‘baptism’ is considerably widened in its metaphorical use, and no one synonym can do justice to its range of meaning as a Christian technical term for the reception of the Spirit.

Acts 1:6 Lord, are you at this time going to restore the kingdom to (for) Israel: It would be very natural to wonder whether these marked the beginning of the last stage in God’s plan. This may reflect the Jewish hope that God would establish his rule in such a way that the people of Israel would be freed from their enemies (especially the Romans) and established as a nation to which other peoples would be subservient. If so, the disciples would appear here as representatives of those of Luke’s readers who had not yet realized that Jesus had transformed the Jewish hope of the kingdom of God from one focused on earthly dominion. Another possibility is that Luke’s readers might think that the ‘times of the Gentiles’, during which Jerusalem was to be desolate, ought now to be coming to an end and giving place to the coming of the kingdom (Luke 21:24, 31); in this case there would be a secondary interpretation of the disciples’ question in terms of the expectations of Luke’s readers. It is less likely that the question is in effect whether the coming of the Spirit is to be interpreted as the restoration of the kingdom. Rather, we have a question about how soon the end is to come, which was natural enough in the context of the resurrection appearances of Jesus.

Acts 1:7 It is not for you to know…: This verse echoes the tradition that the precise time of the parousia is not revealed to human beings; cf Mark 13:32; 1 Thes 5:1-3.

Acts 1:8 you will be my witnesses: This should be seen as echoing or paralleling the frequent references to Isaiah’s hearers in their role as the Lord’s servant acting as witnesses to him (Isa. 43:10, 12; 44:8). In Isaiah the role is a fairly general one of witness to God, his reality, power, and ability to announce beforehand what he is going to do; in Acts the witness is more specifically to the career of Jesus and in particular his resurrection (e.g., 2:32). The theme of witness is prominent throughout Acts, being applied to Peter and his colleagues and to Paul.

Jerusalem: Just as Jerusalem was the city of destiny in the Gospel of Luke (the place where salvation was accomplished), so here at the beginning of Acts, Jerusalem occupies a central position. It is the starting point for the mission of the Christian disciples to “the ends of the earth,” the place where the apostles were situated and the doctrinal focal point in the early days of the community (Acts 15:2, 6).

the ends of the earth: cf. Isa 49:16.  If one places a strong city/geographical accent upon Acts – as Luke clearly does in his gospel, the for Luke, “the ends of the earth” means Rome.

Acts 1:9 as they were looking on, he was lifted up: Luke alone describes the ascension of Jesus as a visible event, although the fact of the ascension is firmly attested elsewhere (1 Tim. 3:16; 1 Pet. 3:21f.), especially in the many passages where the resurrection of Jesus is understood to be not simply his raising from death but also his exaltation to the right hand of God (2:33–35).

Acts 1:10 two men: While the majority of interpreters suggest “angels”, there are scholars who interestingly proposes that the two men represent Jesus’ two predecessors, Moses and Elijah, who also ascended and who were witnesses at the Transfiguration.

Sources

  1. William S. Kurz, “The Acts of the Apostles” in The Collegeville Bible Commentary, eds. Dianne Bergant and Robert J. Karris (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1989)
  2. Howard Marshall, Acts: An Introduction and Commentary, in Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, Volume 5, General Editor: Leon Morris (Downers Grove, IL :InterVarsity Press, 1980)
  3. Gerhard Kittel, Gerhard Friedrich and Geoffrey William Bromiley, Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (Grand Rapids, Mich.: W.B. Eerdmans, 1995)
  4. K. Beale and D. A. Carson, Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament (Grand Rapids, MI; Nottingham, UK: Baker Academic; Apollos, 2007)
  5. Scripture quotes from New American Bible by Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, Inc., Washington, DC. © 1991, 1986, 1970
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s